Sports as seen behind the crowded arenas and into the mind of a sports columnist.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
Why destroy Manny?
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Chito takes over
HANGTIME
Neil Bravo
My kumpadre Chito, an engineer now based in Saudi Arabia and a dyed-in-the-wool sports fan, wrote me an email expressing his thoughts on the recent issues hounding the Philippine Azkals.
Although working far away from home, Chito is not detached from the happenings in sports and politics. Social media has provided the link between him and the country in the same fashion as other Filipinos working overseas are linked to their families here.
Chito says he even starts his mornings reading the Edge online.
I will give this space up for Chito’s thoughts as he wrote:
Dear Pareng Neil,
I am glad to know that Hangtime is back and served daily. I can now look forward to starting my day in front of my laptop with a cup of Arabian coffee and dates on the side. This to me is a perfect way to start a day. Sorry to have not spent a round of golf with you in my last return as I have been hooked more to photography these days.
I think it is very saddening to know that the Azkals have been mired in controversy at a very crucial point of their stint as a national team. Likewise, it is more saddening to know of some unwanted remarks from some media back home regarding the Azkals being less than real Filipinos.
What a shame to have come down to a level of a rumor-mongerer and pass one’s uneducated judgment.
I wonder what is going on to the minds of these people? Here in the Middle East, thousands of Filipinos like me labor under the most extreme conditions and miles away from our families. We have learned to embrace this life as opportunities in our country are not that rosy. OFWs like us live from day to day energized by the fact that we are the lifeblood of an economy that thrives on OFW remittances. It seemed that easy for many, but to us here, there is more to being an OFW than the remittances we infuse to the Philippine economy.
We may not be raising families here, but we belong to those whose lives had to be uprooted from the comforts of our homes to the hostile conditions in an unfamiliar territory.
It pains us to know that someone as respected a broadcaster as Arnold Clavio will refer to those who grew up outside the country as non-citizens. What if I brought my wife Beth here and we bore a child? What if our child grew up in this foreign land? Will he be, as in the mind of Arnold, be less Filipino than say, someone who is born in the Philippines?
This really bothers me.
When I read your piece on this issue and having learned that no apologies will be issued by Arnold or the network, I begin to worry about some of our countrymen here who have brought their families with them. Will Arnold also berate their kids as less Filipinos than a muppet like Arn-Arn?
I think the offended party here is not so much the Azkals but the millions of OFWs and their children. It pains us to know that some people like Arnold thinks that the basic requirement for a citizenship is for one to have his color and for one to grow up in the Philippines.
I hope Arnold opens his eyes and grows up.
Best regards.
Sincerely,
Chito
Thanks for the letter, Pareng Chito. Keep those reactions coming.
By the way, I admire your photography. You got the eye for wonderful shots and puts life even to a dry landscape of the desert sand dunes. Most of all, you are every inch a Filipino and I am tugging my chest and pointing my head as I am saying this.
Until the next cup of Arabian coffee and dates on the side.
(For your comments, email me at bravoneil@rocketmail.com.)
Monday, March 19, 2012
No apology
HANGTIME
Neil Bravo
Arnold Clavio and his employer GMA TV have responded to the controversial issue regarding the broadcaster’s comments made on the network’s morning show program.
That’s the good news. The bad news is, there were no apologies.
Clavio maintained there is nothing wrong in his comments. This was his response as reported on www.gmanetwork.com:
Mga igan, nakakalungkot na may negatibong reaksyon ang naging pahayag ko tungkol sa Philippine Azkals kaugnay ng sexual harassment complaint ni Ms. Cristy Ramos. Wala po akong ganoong intensyon. Ang isyu po rito ay sexual harassment at kung may nagamit man po akong mga salita na hindi angkop, nagpapakumbaba po ako at humihingi ng pang-unawa. Dun naman po sa mga kasama kong nanindigan laban sa sexual harassment, maraming salamat po. Seryoso pong isyu ito na dapat bantayan.
The network has also made their official response to the Philippine Football Federation (PFF) via www.gmanetwork.com. It contained in part the following:
Nais po linawin ng GMA Network na ang mga inirereklamong pahayag ay hindi bahagi ng aming news reporting kung saan tanging mga statement of facts ang ibinabalita at kung saan walang puwang ang pagbibigay ng opinyon ng mga host. Ang mga inireklamong pahayag ay unscripted discussion ng Unang Hirit hosts sa commentary segment ng programa kung saan sila ay nagpalitan ng opinyon at nagbigay ng kani-kanilang pananaw tungkol sa naturang issue.
Nalulungkot po ang GMA Network na iba ang naging intindi ng Philippine Football Federation sa mga sinabi ni Arnold. Ang pinapatungkulan ni Arnold ay hindi kung Filipino citizen o kung may lahing Pilipino ang mga Azkals kundi kung naisapuso at naisaisip ba nila ang kulturang Pinoy.
And to finally nail down the point, GMA maintained their broadcasters did not commit any racist, discriminatory, libelous and malicious comments:
Sa liham ng Philippine Football Federation, sinabi nilang racist, discriminatory, libelous at malicious ang mga pahayag nina Arnold Clavio at Rhea Santos. Pero ang GMA Network po, walang nakitang racist, walang discriminatory, walang libelous at walang malicious sa mga komentaryo nina Arnold at Rhea.
GMA stood by Clavio, Santos and their program and slammed the issue raised by the PFF. Both GMA’s and Clavio’s sides maintain the issue is the sexual harassment issue, not the perceived racist dig.
Oh well, what can you expect?
The explanation made by Clavio and GMA had to serve their interests—first and foremost. They need to keep their reputation intact against an incensed sports community—particularly, football. By issuing those statements, it was clear they had no intention of taking a serious look on their faults. Clavio’s supposed humbling request for understanding is even conditional. He went on to look for sympathy from the pro-sexual harassment advocates.
Oh well, what can you expect?
These people will not just come down on their knees and ask for apologies. No matter what and no matter how obvious.
It is rather difficult to ask for humility and remorse where the larger interest of corporate image, credibility, marketability, and pride is at stake.
Yes, the main issue in the Azkals controversy is the sexual harassment case.
We do not condone sexual harassment here. We are not absolving the two Azkals concerned. There are just some off-timing elements in the case of Clavio’s comments.
First, any broadcaster who knows his journalism understands that there is such a thing as sub judice which means it is inappropriate to comment publicly on cases sub judice, which can be an offense in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publicly discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process.
The case is already with the PFF Disciplinary Committee under investigation it being the level in football hierarchy charged with the investigation of such cases. I understand that the complaint was filed with the AFC but it has to be remanded to the host country’s adjudication level.
If the case is not yet in the court of law is for the complainant to exercise his or her prerogative.
Second, if you are a true Filipino, you do not denigrate a national team moments before they take on a crucial sporting battle on behalf of the country. Prudence dictates to put it off at least when it’s over. Even Cristy Ramos, admire her for her sense of nationalism and propriety, was prudent enough to at least let the issue rest while the Nationals are off to secure history for the country.
Third, the comments were too sweeping. It was made to curse every half-Pinoys in the team and all others of the same circumstances whether Azkals or not.
True, the network has no control of their opinion. But even one’s opinion, in the exercise of one’s freedom of speech, is not absolute. Where for obvious reasons, a broadcaster goes beyond the limits of journalistic freedom, the internal controls of a network can take its course even when the broadcast is taped as live and the remarks come with spontaneity.
If a network can allow such freedom to go unbridled within the context of professionalism and ethics, I am afraid even a muppet may be licensed to berate with impunity.
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Careless Clavio
HANGTIME
Neil Bravo
Arnold Clavio must have felt by now the heat from an incensed sports community.
After Clavio and his co-host Rhea Santos made some comments considered by the offended Philippine Football Federation (PFF) and several sports fans as racist, libelous and discriminatory.
The PFF has also formally filed a complaint letter to the GMA authorities over the said comments made on the Unang Hirit program last March 13.
What has gotten into the mind of Clavio to suddenly go on a barking spree? He lashed at the Azkals in the middle of the AFC Challenge Cup where the Azkals by now have made him swallow his own rabies with a historic win and a semifinals seat in the tough AFC Group Stages.
A video of Clavio’s tirades against the Azkals went viral on Youtube and the legions of Azkal fans responded with loud and violent reaction like a barking pack of canines coming to the rescue of a wounded buddy.
In the said morning show, Clavio was seen calling the Azkals' behavior to the Cristy Ramos complaint as "insensitive," and then proceeded by questioning the citizenship of some members of the Azkals team. He also talked of their sexual tirades and use of antibiotics. Clavio’s barking spree got second voice from co-host Santos.
Among the tirades of Clavio cited in the PFF complaint: "Dapat maging aral na sa inyo 'yan. Ang yayabang niyo. Porke't dinadagsa kayo ng mga [fans] ang guguwapo ni'yo, 'di ba?. Parang God's gift to women,.”
"Ngayon nag-sorry para daw sa isa nilang kasamahan. Saan ka nakakitang Azkal na may suso? Anong 'Cup D, maybe a Cup B' sa isang kasama? Palusot na lang 'yon. Sana kung nag-sorry, sorry na lang talaga.”
Then came his hardest dig: "Eh, hindi naman kayo Filipino, nagpapanggap lang kayong kayumanggi, hindi dito lumaki. Mahirap 'yon, insensitive."
And then more: "Alam naman nila' yung mga 'sexcapades' nila sa isa't isa, sino ang nag-penicillin, alam naman nila 'yan."
First, this is not to cloud the issue nor cover up the main issue of the Azkals-Ramos controversy. That case is already with the PFF Disciplinary Committee. Ramos has not filed with the courts either any sexual harassment raps against the two Azkals.
We don’t know what went into the mind of Clavio. He suddenly went berserk like he was God’s gift to broadcasting. But he was far from that.
I watched the morning show as I was writing this anticipating there might be an apology or an explanation from the network or Clavio himself. Instead, I was tickled to find that one of the presentors of the show is a soy sauce brand featuring the Azkals. The ad’s message is simple—whether you are pure Pinoy or half-Pinoy, you will love this soy sauce. Good thing, the brand has not pulled out their ad yet.
I don’t know if Clavio has seen this ad for him to know there is such a thing as pure-Pinoy and half-Pinoy and that under citizenship laws, there is no distinction. That is assuming he does not know Art. 4, Sec. 1, par. 2 and 4 of the Philippine Constitution.
Paragraph 2 says you only need one Filipino parent to have the citizenship of this country like most Fil-foreigners whether in sports or in show business including several stars of the network. Paragraph 4 says you can also be naturalized like Marcus Douthit of the Smart Gilas.
Women’s world boxing champion Ana Julaton, who belongs to the network, is also half-Pinoy having been born in San Francisco, California.
No need to elaborate on that, I do not believe Clavio does not know the law. Perhaps even his muppet look-alike Arn-Arn knows that. There are 8.7 to 11 million Filipinos outside the country. They comprise 11% of our population. And they are no lesser Filipinos. They even vote during elections wherever they are.
You also don’t need to have brown skin or to have lived your life entirely in the country to be Filipino. Nonito Donaire did not grow up in the country. President Aquino spent some years of his life in Boston. Grace Lee is not Filipino but Clavio’s employer embraced her.
There simply was no rhyme and reason for Clavio to berate the Azkals who have earned the respect and adulation of many not only because they look good, but because they fought and risked their limbs for the country. If some of them committed SH against Cristy Ramos, let the investigation or even the courts take its course.
Was Clavio in the locker room on the day the alleged SH happened? Was he with the Azkals when, according to him, they used penicillin (an antibiotic used to treat bacteria)?
I think it’s weird for someone who calls himself ‘Igan (friend). There is a term young people use for that—F.C. Feeling close.
Clavio and his employers must take action by way of a response, apology or disciplinary action. He cannot hide behind the image he has created for himself. No offense here but watching the morning news for a long time now, we have grown to believe that Clavio has two personalities--half-man half-muppet.
If Clavio cannot face this issue himself, let Arn-Arn do it for him.
(Neil Bravo now writes for Edge Davao as Sports Editor. This column came out on its March 18-19 issue.)
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Tequila Saturday
MASTER BLASTER
Neil Bravo
I took a shot of Tequila on Saturday night, the night before Manny Pacquiao fought Juan Manuel Marquez for the third time.
The crystal clear liquid left a burning feeling on its way down my throat. And then I kind of turned cocky.
There’s something strange about Tequila than most alcohol. In my case, I could gulp down Scotch or sip brandy and still feel good. But Tequila has a way of getting me off my senses. Even with the slightest drip.
I took a drink to see how I can stand against Tequila for another time. I have not made a good man out of me when drinking Tequila, so I thought I’d give it another shot.
It’s been some time since I last wrote a piece for this space. I thought it would take longer but some friends kept egging on what I have to say about the much-talked about Pacman-Marquez III fight.
This was one fight I got the privilege of being interviewed before, during and after—I was asked for my forecast two days before fight night on GMA Radio and TV, did the commentary on One Radio FM and was again asked by Jun Digamon of GMA Radio in a post-fight interview.
Just about everyone has said his piece on this fight. From known boxing experts to the day-after geniuses. Will the debate ever stop on whether or not the Pacman won this fight? Maybe not too soon.
The simple question? Did Manny win that fight?
The answers are kilometric. Oftentimes unresponsive and straying elsewhere and drifting on conditional clauses before banging it in. It’s just a yes or no.
My answer is a clear yes. It’s a win for Manny. But did I like it? No, I don’t.
Just put it away like that.
I did not like it because I had wanted Manny to destroy Marquez completely. I think that was what every Pacquiao rooter wanted—a convincing, destructive, and explosive win by Manny to once and for all silence this boisterous Mexican hombre.
An explosive fight is just as original a trademark for Manny Pacquiao in the same manner an effective counterpunching is a Marquez trademark. And trademarks are here to last. Just like Tequila. For all there is to it, Tequila will still be the same Tequila whether there’s an agave plant worm or not. Whether it’s 80 proof or 110 proof. Diluted with water or undiluted.
On a night like that, my bout with Tequila ended the way it was in previous times. The same shot of Tequila was still the same Tequila. Same cockiness. Same fire.
That was the same Marquez we saw. Cocky and dangerous. Yet despite all that sting and burning fire within, Marquez is as cold and passive as Tequila. It’s not your most preferred type of drink but if you want to get drunk, try it.
So when we got bored with Manny disposing off lumbering giants and old warriors like Clottey, Margarito and Moseley, we were kind of asking for a cocky drink. Mosely was like old wine, Clottey was cerveza negra and Margarito much more like Margarita. And so we asked for Tequila.
At age 38, Marquez was supposed to be a diluted Tequila at 80 proof. No longer the dangerous 110 proof version he was once before. But Marquez came to the fight like a brand new, distilled Tequila straight out of the Mexican highlands of Jalisco. He brandished the old sting that lulled many to submission.
By the time Manny felt the zing of Marquez, he was out of his balance and was not the same Manny he used to be. Good thing is Manny understands that boxing is addition and not subtraction. You add more punches, the more chances of winning. It no longer counts who made the better hits. Remember, there is no three-point shot in boxing. So all you need is to pile up the points. Throw more punches. Become the aggressor. Nobody wins a fight by running away or backing off.
Manny did not hit the better shots. Marquez hit the better shots. But Manny hit more and Marquez fewer. Manny went buckets after buckets of ice cold beer. Marquez settled with a shot glass of Tequila each time.
Boxing is a job. The more you work, the more you produce. The more you produce the more you earn. Manny was harder at work. Juan Manuel waited to be served before he does his work.
So would you like to have another serving of Pacman-Marquez?
Naah.
Too much of Tequila. Let’s try Floyd. Smoothie this time.